Downey v. Instaloans Financial Options Centres McLennan Ross acted for the Defendants in this course action commenced in Ontario against a loan that is payday, that has been solved included in the general settlement associated with Ontario and Alberta course procedures against our consumers. The settlement agreements had been authorized by the Courts in Ontario and Alberta.
Fong et al v. Grenville-Germain Calgary Limited Partnership McLennan Ross acted for the directors of a business which constructed an extra condominium/hotel/office complex within an action commenced with respect to the owners of the domestic condominiums for misrepresentations and deficiencies.
Hudyma v. LoyaltyOne, Inc. et al McLennan Ross acted for the transportation that is international with regards to an action critical link involving a sizable travel facilitator as well as the incorporation of gas surcharges when you look at the calculation of expenses.
Kilroy v. a okay payday loans inc. et al it was A uk Columbia course action against lots of pay day loan operations, by which McLennan Ross represented three associated with Defendants. The Plaintiff discontinued its action against our customers.
Korte v. Cormie McLennan Ross had been counsel to your auditors in this step, a proceeding that is“representative ahead of the utilization of course procedures legislation in Alberta, that has been brought with respect to most of the investors in 2 subsidiaries regarding the Principal Group, an economic conglomerate that failed. The problem ended up being settled just before exams for breakthrough.
McLennan Ross assisted as Alberta counsel in commencing the course action in Alberta during the request of British Columbia counsel, that has currently commenced an action in British Columbia. The problem had been settled in British Columbia.
MacKinnon v. National cash Mart et al This course action had been brought in British Columbia contrary to the major operators within the loan industry that is payday. McLennan Ross had been counsel to 1 for the Defendants. We had been effective in opposing a software for official official certification, following that the Plaintiff discontinued this course of action as against our customers.
Nette v. Stiles et al In this proposed course action, the Plaintiff advertised from the Alberta national therefore the College of Chiropractors that one therapy ended up being harmful and really should never be allowed when you look at the Province of Alberta. McLennan Ross represented a Defendant and brought a credit card applicatoin to truly have the claim dismissed ahead of certification. The Plaintiff discontinued against our customer ahead of the application had been argued.
O’Keefe v. Menu Foods working Limited Partnership McLennan Ross ended up being taking part in a course action brought by owners alleging that certain associated with the major suppliers of pet meals in Alberta didn’t have quality settings in position which lead to the loss of home animals from tainted meals. This litigation had been remedied by settlement between the events.
Pauli et al v. Ace INA Insurance et al McLennan Ross acted as Alberta counsel for example regarding the Defendants in this course of action which desired an interpretation for the Insurance Act and a return of any deductible charged where there clearly was a total loss in automobile under consideration. The action ended up being settled in preference of the Defendants after an overview dedication of the point of legislation.
Ramias v. Johnson McLennan Ross had been counsel towards the Plaintiffs in this class that is putative which reported investment fraudulence and securities violations. It had been discontinued after settlement aided by the Defendants.
Tschritter v. Instaloans Financial Options Centres McLennan Ross had been counsel to your Defendants in this class action brought against a loan that is payday within the Province of Alberta, that was fixed included in the general settlement associated with the Ontario and Alberta course procedures against our consumers (see Bruley and Downey above).
1023926 Alberta Ltd. v. Bank of America et al Class actions have already been filed against Visa, MasterCard, and a quantity of banking institutions in British Columbia, Alberta, Quebec and Ontario, claiming losings on the part of Canadian merchants who accepted re re payment for products or solutions by means of Visa or MasterCard charge cards associated with solution charges and limitations on company techniques that have been needed to be able to accept payments that are such. McLennan Ross will act as Alberta representative for counsel for example of this Defendant banking institutions. The issues are susceptible to case that is coordinated and are also ongoing.
Alexander and Barrett v. HMS Financial et al McLennan Ross is co-counsel for the Plaintiffs with regards to a nationwide and class that is cross-border alleging securities fraudulence. This course of action ended up being certified as against many specific and business Defendants, including major institutions that are financial. We’ve restored a few million bucks when it comes to course people.
Bird v. Blott & Associates et al McLennan Ross is representing among the Defendants in this proposed course action with respect to a quantity of domestic college claimants. We now have simply filed A declaration of Defence as well as the action have not yet been certified.
Covidien LLC McLennan Ross is representing Covidien LLC in 2 course actions brought by people who had urinary mesh implanted. Covidien is the one supplier (amongst many named manufacturers and suppliers) of the item in Canada. The litigation mirrors class that is similar brought in the us.
L’Hirondelle v Medicentres An $11 million course action lawsuit happens to be filed more than a laptop that is missing individual and wellness information of 620,000 Albertans. The lawsuit alleges Medicentres did not protect personal information and had been negligent in using significantly more than four months to tell the general public concerning the privacy breach. McLennan Ross is counsel into the IT consulting firm, whom employed the IT consultant whom owned the laptop that is missing.
Phillips and Wournell v. Image (Topco) companies Limited et al This proposed class proceeding in British Columbia, associated with the Tracy action below, is brought against people and entities alleging conveyance that is fraudulent of associated with the ongoing Tracy payday advances course proceeding. Defence of the action is ongoing.
Poseidon Concepts Corp. McLennan Ross is lead counsel to your auditors of Poseidon Concepts Corp. (Poseidon) in a shareholder course action claim in Alberta for $650 million, along with relevant actions filed in Alberta, Ontario, Quebec, and nyc. The events mixed up in different disputes, besides the Plaintiff investors, consist of: Poseidon through its Monitor, Underwriters, a Lending Syndicate of chartered banking institutions, a predecessor general public firm, as well as the directors and officers of Poseidon.
Tracy v. Instaloans Financial Solution Centres McLennan Ross is counsel towards the Defendants in course action procedures into the Province of British Columbia. The course action alleges that the Defendant payday loan providers had been operated unlawfully and claims damages into the tens of vast amounts. Defence regarding the proceeding continues subsequent to its official official certification as a course action.
